Wednesday, September 14, 2005

can we lose the war on terror

I can not take credit for this article. I do not know who wrote it. I just happen to agree with it.

Subject: War on Terror: Can we lose?

This is a "must" read.


Whether Republican, Democrat, Libertarian or 'neutral,' I would highly recommend you read all of this message. I am sending it to you just as I received it. A long read, but well worth the time it takes to read it all. Or save it for when you have time.

The author is anonymous as someone removed the author's name, which is unfortunate for not receiving due credit for his or her insights. I think you'll agree, after reading it, the author could or maybe should be a major contributor to our Foreign Policy Think Tank.

PLEASE read. You may or may not agree with some of the conclusions, but the premise is all too real.

*******************************************************************

To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine, which includes World War II.

The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.

First, let's examine a few basics:

1. When did the threat to us start?

Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer, as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:

1979 - Iran Embassy hostages

1983 - Beirut, Lebanon Embassy

1983 - Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks

1989 - Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York

1996 - Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers military complex

1988 - Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy

1998 - Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy

2001 - Pentagon

(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).


2. Why were we attacked?

Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats as there were no significant provocation's by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.

3. Who were the attackers?

In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.

4. What is the Muslim population of the World?

25% of the world's population.

5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?

Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also a Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons
(including 7,000 Polish priests). http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the 6 million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian or any others.

Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?

6. So who are we at war with?

There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.

So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1. Can we lose this war?

2. What does losing really mean?

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.

We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?

It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing really means is:

We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorist to attack us, until we were neutered and submissive to them.

We would of course have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see, we are impotent and cannot help them.

They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.

The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast!

If we lose this war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us, if they were threatened by the Muslims.

If we can't stop the Muslims, how could anyone else?

The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too -- and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.

Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.

So, how can we lose the war?

Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!

Let me give you a few examples of how we simply do not comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.

Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Norman Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, refuses to allow any profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?

This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.

And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and, in fact, added many more since then.

Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?

No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our "Political Correctness", and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head!

Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.

Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying.

We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.

These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.

And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.

And still more recently, the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.

Can this be for real?

The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense.

If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.

To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.

Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.

Again I say, this does not mean that most of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude, of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years.

Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels! That translates into all non-Muslims -- not just in the United States, but throughout the world.

We are the last bastion of defense.

We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant'. That charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!

We can't!

If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and no other free country in the World will survive if we are defeated!

And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.

This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.

If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years -- or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions. The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?

Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically-correct piece by politically-correct piece.

And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.

They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims" ?

I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I had hoped after the election, the factions in our country would begin to focus on the the critical situation we are in, and would unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.

After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world.

Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world!



Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too.



There are those that find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!

10 Comments:

At 2:36 PM, Anonymous Oscar said...

"The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die? So who are we at war with? "

There was also a big faction of "non-peaceful" Germans who were bitterly opposed to Hitler and worked to kill him and the other Nazi leaders. Not just protesters like the Weisse Rose-- insiders, higher-ups like Stauffenberg, Popitz, Hassell and countless others who attacked the Nazi leadership from within. (Indeed, Konrad Adenauer-- who opposed the Nazis and survived the war-- was the one who presided over Germany's postwar resurgency as a great power.) That such extensive resistance was present is impressive considering not only the danger of the Gestapo, but also the tens of thouands of other prominent German opponents whom Hitler sent to the concentration camps in the early 1930's.

I do think that there is such resistance in Arab countries as well against al-Qaida and their fanatics, from people in places like Lebanon and even within Iran, not to mention Saudi Arabia where the people hate their oppressive rulers, that we can support. They're not interested in anti-US terrorism-- they want their corrupt oligarchs out of power. Those are the people whom we should probably strengthen.

 
At 1:30 PM, Blogger smithy said...

You are a victim of the mainstream media my friend, there is no such thing as moderate Muslims. If you consider 4 of 5 people as peaceful. The vast majority are in love with Usama. The so called war on terror is a war of ideology, you are dealing with people that are following the Islamic teaching (the quran) it is the quran that incite all this violence not some extremist group like Al qaida. Simply read the quran and the life of Muhamed you would have to be blind not to see the ugliness of this Cult. I lived in the Islamic world for years, the vast majority of the people in Islamic world would love to see the sharia law implemented across the world whether peacefully or by the sword it does not matter to them. Killing an infidel to them is just like killing a Raccoon that is pestering you in your attic to them it’s not even a crime.

Unless the teaching is changed and the head of the snake is severed nothing will change. Go ahead-Keep apologizing for them, till the hallal knife slit your throat and your kids throat. In the mean time I'll keep reporting the truth without any political correctness or restraints.

Good luck my friend who ever you are

smithy

 
At 3:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is difficult to consider a group peaceful, when half the population is oppressed. Women all over the world are suffering under Islamic law.

“Men have authority over women, for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expanded of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient … and those you fear may be rebellious, admonish them to their couch, and beat them.”
(Koran, Women, verse 38)

According to Islam, women are property, and if this property causes any “fear”, simply beat them. This is peaceful???

Imagine… A man marries a woman, he vows to love her and respect her, to take her as his equal to share his life with. The couple conceives a daughter out of that love. They raise the child in a loving and a nurturing home. In turn, the man’s daughter grows up and falls in love and begins her own family, and the cycle continues.

Isn’t that the way it is supposed to be? Not in Islam. For if the wife causes the man any stress, he may beat her. If his daughter disobeys, he may beat her. Then he may send his daughter to a man, that in turn, may beat her.

Now imagine giving “permission” for a man to beat YOUR daughter…

Until Islam changes, and becomes peaceful and respectful to Islamic people, how can anyone expect Islam to be peaceful to non-Islamic people.

 
At 8:14 AM, Anonymous Sab said...

Excuse me?

 
At 9:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see a short term solution...which would at least stabilize our energy problem. Since the muslim world holds most of the oil aces, and the situation will get worse with the fools in Iran determined to get the bomb.

I think we should turn our troops in Iraq southwest and invade and take Saudia Arabia! This would secure the largest single source of oil in the world. The Saudi royal family is only hanging on to threads of control anyway and the radical muslims will soon finish them off. The royal family is as two faced as they come but they will fall to the islamic clerics!

A second reason to control (must be brutal force)Saudia Arabia, is that we would then have a grip on the very heart of Islam! Like controling the catholic church by taking the Vatican.

Finally, taking Saudi Arabia will give us stratigic ground to deal with Iran and secure the Persian Gulf!

I do not believe that the muslim problem will ever go away! So if the muslims want to eliminate all things western, then I for one want to go down fighting!!!

 
At 9:48 PM, Blogger ninest123 said...

ninest123 16.03
polo ralph lauren outlet, longchamp outlet, longchamp, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, nike free, oakley sunglasses, burberry outlet online, jordan shoes, louboutin, longchamp outlet, replica watches, michael kors, cheap oakley sunglasses, michael kors outlet, chanel handbags, gucci outlet, ray ban sunglasses, ugg boots, tory burch outlet, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton, ugg boots, louis vuitton, nike air max, nike outlet, michael kors outlet, ugg boots, louis vuitton outlet, nike air max, michael kors outlet, burberry, louboutin outlet, prada handbags, oakley sunglasses, replica watches, louis vuitton, tiffany jewelry, christian louboutin outlet, ray ban sunglasses, ugg boots, louis vuitton outlet, uggs on sale, polo ralph lauren outlet, michael kors outlet, prada outlet, louboutin shoes, oakley sunglasses

 
At 9:51 PM, Blogger ninest123 said...

true religion outlet, nike free run uk, ray ban uk, ralph lauren pas cher, michael kors, north face, coach outlet, michael kors, lululemon, ray ban pas cher, nike air max, oakley pas cher, converse pas cher, nike air max, sac longchamp, vanessa bruno, hermes, hogan, hollister pas cher, air force, abercrombie and fitch, tn pas cher, vans pas cher, true religion jeans, kate spade handbags, true religion jeans, new balance pas cher, air max, north face, nike roshe, louboutin pas cher, true religion jeans, longchamp pas cher, mulberry, burberry, coach purses, michael kors, ralph lauren uk, nike blazer, air jordan pas cher, nike free, sac guess, lacoste pas cher, coach outlet, hollister, nike roshe run, replica handbags, timberland, michael kors, nike air max

 
At 9:53 PM, Blogger ninest123 said...

nike air max, longchamp, baseball bats, new balance, oakley, p90x workout, soccer jerseys, timberland boots, insanity workout, giuseppe zanotti, hollister, soccer shoes, reebok shoes, iphone 6s cases, vans shoes, nike air max, mac cosmetics, jimmy choo shoes, mont blanc, ralph lauren, vans, bottega veneta, iphone 6s plus cases, birkin bag, instyler, iphone 6 plus cases, abercrombie and fitch, nike trainers, wedding dresses, lululemon, iphone 5s cases, mcm handbags, nfl jerseys, hollister, herve leger, iphone 6 cases, nike huarache, ipad cases, north face outlet, louboutin, beats by dre, s5 cases, nike roshe, iphone cases, asics running shoes, hollister, babyliss, ghd, north face outlet, chi flat iron, celine handbags, ferragamo shoes, valentino shoes

 
At 9:55 PM, Blogger ninest123 said...

pandora charms, sac louis vuitton pas cher, karen millen, ugg pas cher, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, swarovski, lancel, toms shoes, coach outlet, wedding dresses, canada goose, doudoune canada goose, moncler, barbour jackets, moncler, moncler outlet, pandora jewelry, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, moncler, louis vuitton, pandora charms, barbour, pandora jewelry, moncler, replica watches, converse, gucci, canada goose outlet, moncler, juicy couture outlet, canada goose outlet, louis vuitton, bottes ugg, canada goose, louis vuitton, juicy couture outlet, louis vuitton, supra shoes, moncler, montre pas cher, canada goose, ray ban, canada goose, links of london, thomas sabo, swarovski crystal, marc jacobs, moncler, ugg boots uk, hollister, canada goose uk, converse outlet
ninest123 16.03

 
At 11:13 AM, Blogger princess Totta said...

http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/company-spraying-pesticides-anti-insects-in-al-hasa.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/pesticides-spray-anti-insect-company-jubail.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/company-spraying-pesticides-anti-insects-in-khobar.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/pesticides-spray-anti-insect-company-dammam.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home